<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Printing up your book for submission purposes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://behlerblog.com/2012/07/27/printing-up-your-book-for-submission-purposes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://behlerblog.com/2012/07/27/printing-up-your-book-for-submission-purposes/</link>
	<description>Publishing from my side of the desk</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 13:55:22 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lynnpricewrites</title>
		<link>http://behlerblog.com/2012/07/27/printing-up-your-book-for-submission-purposes/#comment-17844</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[lynnpricewrites]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 05:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behlerblog.com/?p=7041#comment-17844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Rosemary, I would suggest that if an author wants a desk copy, simply printing it out would make the most sense, rather than spending a lot of money to print up actual books. This is different from self-publishing.

My post isn&#039;t a commentary on self-publishing because that&#039;s a very personal decision. What I tried to convey is that it&#039;s unwise to self publish a book with the intent of trying to capture a mainstream publishing contract. From what I can discern from your post, we are talking about two different issues.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rosemary, I would suggest that if an author wants a desk copy, simply printing it out would make the most sense, rather than spending a lot of money to print up actual books. This is different from self-publishing.</p>
<p>My post isn&#8217;t a commentary on self-publishing because that&#8217;s a very personal decision. What I tried to convey is that it&#8217;s unwise to self publish a book with the intent of trying to capture a mainstream publishing contract. From what I can discern from your post, we are talking about two different issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rosemary O'Grady</title>
		<link>http://behlerblog.com/2012/07/27/printing-up-your-book-for-submission-purposes/#comment-17843</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rosemary O'Grady]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2012 04:39:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behlerblog.com/?p=7041#comment-17843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The key words are - &#039;for submission purposes...&#039;
IF, however, a writer simply needs to clear a desk-see a book in print (for any number of reasoons)- self-publishing is a way to  make it happen - and it has a long and illustrious history. Many great writers were or began as self-published.
A recent edition of The Times Literary Supplement actually commends writers who go to such lengths - thereby preserving to posterity work which would be lost in the commercial race to the bottom of most contemporary book-marketting.
Sorry, it&#039;s not &#039;epic stupidity&#039; at all. 
Rosemary O&#039;Grady]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key words are &#8211; &#8216;for submission purposes&#8230;&#8217;<br />
IF, however, a writer simply needs to clear a desk-see a book in print (for any number of reasoons)- self-publishing is a way to  make it happen &#8211; and it has a long and illustrious history. Many great writers were or began as self-published.<br />
A recent edition of The Times Literary Supplement actually commends writers who go to such lengths &#8211; thereby preserving to posterity work which would be lost in the commercial race to the bottom of most contemporary book-marketting.<br />
Sorry, it&#8217;s not &#8216;epic stupidity&#8217; at all.<br />
Rosemary O&#8217;Grady</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Holloway</title>
		<link>http://behlerblog.com/2012/07/27/printing-up-your-book-for-submission-purposes/#comment-17800</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dan Holloway]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jul 2012 19:49:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behlerblog.com/?p=7041#comment-17800</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s extraordinary that people would do this. Assuming you aren&#039;t fully self-publishing, the one time it can make sense to use a print on demand service is when you&#039;re approaching your final draft, for editing purposes - you do see more, or rather different, things, as well as it being convenient for orderly notes. If you do this, keep your book private on the service, and don&#039;t add an ISBN]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s extraordinary that people would do this. Assuming you aren&#8217;t fully self-publishing, the one time it can make sense to use a print on demand service is when you&#8217;re approaching your final draft, for editing purposes &#8211; you do see more, or rather different, things, as well as it being convenient for orderly notes. If you do this, keep your book private on the service, and don&#8217;t add an ISBN</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vanessa Russell</title>
		<link>http://behlerblog.com/2012/07/27/printing-up-your-book-for-submission-purposes/#comment-17793</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vanessa Russell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2012 16:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://behlerblog.com/?p=7041#comment-17793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wow, a printed book and galley submissions ... I can feel their desperation from here. Reminds me of a cancer victim investing in vitamins; it&#039;s going to take something a lot stronger to help. But to know now that editors throw away such gallant efforts somehow is sad enough for me to reply ... And now I&#039;m at a loss for words.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, a printed book and galley submissions &#8230; I can feel their desperation from here. Reminds me of a cancer victim investing in vitamins; it&#8217;s going to take something a lot stronger to help. But to know now that editors throw away such gallant efforts somehow is sad enough for me to reply &#8230; And now I&#8217;m at a loss for words.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
