I’m a perfect fit, so why did you reject me?

I spent some time this past weekend getting caught up with queries and submissions. Out of twenty-five queries that were sitting in my goodie pile, I asked to see full proposals on two, and rejected the rest. Out of three proposals, I’ve rejected one and am still reading the other two.

As invariably happens, someone I rejected emails back wondering if my list is full and whether they’d misinterpreted my submission guidelines. I know what they’re getting at. They were under the impression their work was a perfect fit for us, and are puzzled as to why  I rejected them. And sure, on the face of it, the works do fit our guidelines. But that doesn’t mean I’m going to request pages.

The fact that you queried someone who publishes the type of work you happen to have written isn’t cause célèbre.  I mean, that’s WHY publishers have submission guidelines – to save all of us from wasting everyone’s time. All this confirms is that your reading comprehension skills are spot on. But that doesn’t instantly translate over to the fact that I’m going to be interested in reviewing the work.

Editors reject at the query stage for a whole host of reasons. But the main elements that go into my decisions are:

  1. Am I passionate about this story?
  2. Do I believe I can sell it to the marketplace?
  3. Do I believe the author has a large enough platform in which to help promote the book?

Am I passionate about this story?

Being a small publisher, I have the luxury of throwing my passion into every work we publish. That’s why it’s so hard for me to pick a favorite Behler book. I love them all for many different reasons. And I think this element goes into every editor’s thought process. We have to be passionate about what we choose because we have to fight for it over the lifetime of that book.

We have to convince our sales teams that it’s worthy. We have to convince reviewers why they’d be hoof-sucking bovines for reviewing this book. We have to convince libraries and bookstores that they’d be Butthead’s’ inbred second cousin if they don’t shelf/buy this title. All this takes passion because it’s spread over a long period of time. That’s why orphaned books [books who have lost their editors] often get canceled. They’ve lost their biggest advocate.

So what makes me passionate about a query that’s only one page long?

Communication: This is your story, so did you communicate effectively so that I have a clear view of its foundations? I do own a tinfoil hat, but it often clashes with my outfit, so I let the beagle wear it. Works great when she’s buying lottery tickets.

Many times I reject something and the author writes back stating that I misunderstood their story. Weeellll…until the day arrives when I can climb inside the peaks and valleys of your melon, I’m hindered by what you send me. You gotta say it right the first time, ‘cos thar don’t be no second chances.

Unique: Does the story – be it fiction or nonfiction – have a unique twist that piques my interest? And yes, this is subjective. And no, you have no way of knowing what that is because I don’t even know what it is – not until I see it.

Characters: Do I love the characters? Are they people I’ll fall in love with so much that I care what happens to them? They are the vehicle that makes your story sing. Flop characters = dry rot as far as I’m concerned.

Message: Sure, I want to be entertained, but I also want to learn something along the way. I want my life to be altered and elevated in some manner. So I look for what the story has to say,  the overall message. I want to walk away from a book and feel that I’m a wiser/more thoughtful/introspective/smarter/kinder person for having read it. The stronger the impact, the higher my passion for the project. It’s a good thing if I’m blown out of my chair.

Do I believe I can sell it to the marketplace?

It may be that you’ve presented me with cool characters, some hearty food for thought, and a unique storyline, but that doesn’t mean I can sell it that that fickle mistress, The Marketplace. These are the hard rejections. They have all the elements that get my passionate juices flowing, but I’m unsure if  it will appeal to a wide enough audience to warrant the costs of publication.

Yeah, about that Almighty Dollar: I’ve been embroiled in enough debates that denigrate being a slave to the Almighty Dollar and how it’s the root of all evil because it counts out some really good books. But facts are that I need that Almighty Dollar in order to keep the beagle in designer dog chewies and electricity powering my batcave. That means I have to look for books I believe will sell.

And yes, these are the times when I don’t like my job so much and wish we ran on an economy of designer dog chewies. I have lots of those.

Do I believe the author has a large enough platform in which to help promote the book?

There are times when all the stars aren’t quite in alignment – and I really hate it when the stars don’t play nice. I’m talking about the many topics written in an impacted category – cancer, bipolar disorder, divorce, family issues, Alzheimer’s. I can almost feel my trigger finger caressing the rejection button. But wait, sez my inner demons. Check out their bio.

Cha-ching! Platform.

There are so many worthy books that are written to enlighten, educate, inspire, and soothe. And many of those are in heavily impacted categories and take a big voice in order to be heard above the din of competing titles on a crowded bookshelf. None of those speak more loudly than a big author platform.

Rejection was nearly the end result with Barry Petersen’s Jan’s Story because the first words that bounced off his agent’s query was Alzheimer’s. Whoa babe, seen a gajillion of these. But I was intrigued because it was Early Onset Alzheimer’s. When one does an Amazon check, the number of Early Onset Alzheimer’s personal journeys slurks down to very few. And no one has Barry’s platform. Or his incredible story.

In the amount of time it takes to say, “beagle, fire up the blender,” I knew that Barry’s book would become the Great Yoda of Early Onset Alzheimer’s because no other book adequately expresses the personal journey of those left behind to care for the young victims of this cruel disease. If not for Barry’s platform, his book would probably not bear the Alzheimer’s Association’s logo or be on its meteoric rise as a “gotta have it.”

Yes, rejection blows, and it’s all too easy to scratch your head and wonder if the Cosmic Muffin is agin you. “What’s it take?” you scream. Well, a lot of things, actually.

14 Responses to I’m a perfect fit, so why did you reject me?

  1. NinjaFingers says:

    I generally assume that most rejections are because, well, the editor didn’t like it.

    (I actually love the editor of one short story magazine because that is his form ‘I didn’t like it enough’. Go honesty).

    I have a couple of stories I think may not be good enough period, and a few that are too strange.

    But I assume and accept that there is a heck of a lot of subjectivity in this business. And an agent or an editor who doesn’t love your work as much as you do is not going to give you what you need.

  2. I generally assume that most rejections are because, well, the editor didn’t like it.

    You can see that isn’t always the case. There are sometimes a lot of elements that go into a “send me pages,” or a “no thanks.”

  3. NinjaFingers says:

    That’s true. I just think it’s good to emphasize that there is subjectivity. *Especially* in fiction.

  4. Sarah says:

    I’ve never understood writers who rant that the industry’s devotion to the Almighty Dollar is all that stands between them and the New York Times Best Seller List.

    They want to get paid, don’t they? If it’s legitimate for them to want a royalty check, then the publisher is allowed to at least break even.

    (Of course, it’s easy for me to say that. I fully expect to make my first million as a teacher, and not as a YA author.)

  5. Ninjie, there’s subjectivity in all genres, fiction and nonfiction. Fun, ain’t it?

  6. Sally Zigmond says:

    Great post, Lynn. And let’s thank Lynn’s Cosmic Muffin for subjectivity. (Who wants to live in a world where we all sit around nodding in agreement like a row of wooden dolls?) It also means there’s one agent/editor out there somewhere willing to bet his or her very last fluff-covered jellybean on a manuscript everyone else has rejected.

  7. averyoslo says:

    It makes sense that agents are subjective and just a creative as writers. Writers can’t write great books that they don’t love, and agents can’t represent books they don’t love.

    And no one can tell a writer what to write, or tell agents what to accept for the same reason– because it’s a labor of love.

    If writers want creative freedom, we have to accept that agents need it, too. Which sometimes means a lot of rejections.

  8. Those same tenets hold true for editors as well, averyoslo.

  9. NinjaFingers says:

    If the agent or editor doesn’t love your book as much as you do, they are NOT going to do the job it deserves. Period.

  10. Ninjie, you’re more correct than you realize. An editor friend graciously took on an orphaned book – the original editor was laid off. She had no passion for it at all but didn’t want to see it dumped. Her problem was that she had her own list to worry about, so this little orphan was sort of shoved between the cracks.

    When she finally turned it into her boss, the prevailing attitude was, “Pity no one did a better editing job on this. Ah well.”

    Yikes! They knowingly pubbed an inferior product and it happened because that poor book lost its biggest advocate.

  11. NinjaFingers says:

    My dream agent…the one who calls me after getting the full and says ‘I couldn’t put it down’.

    I actually had a beta reader say that on my latest novel…and that’s second draft. Ending needs tweaking, but I have some hope for this one!

    It’s art. You can’t make good art without passion, and that passion has to flow through everyone involved.

  12. Madison Woods says:

    Hi Lynn, I enjoyed reading this post and learned some of what goes into rejections. But I sure hope you’re not calling your faithful reviewers ‘hoof-sucking bovines’! They might not like that 😉

  13. Um, no, Madison, I would never call a reviewer a hoof sucking bovine. It was meant to be a lighthearted joke.

  14. Eddie Vega says:

    “Why did you reject me?” We recently posted a Noir Nation magazine promotional video on Youtube by that very title. (See it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C6dcAFNGslM). It’s worth a look, especially if you are a crime fiction writer looking for venues to place your work. Best! — Eddie Vega, Noir Nation editor.

Tell me what you really think

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: